LNWR No. 3020 “Cornwall”

(1 customer review)



  • Numerous camera views
  • Period accurate LNWR Lamps
  • Realistic Fully Functional Cab
  • Custom sounds
  • Customizable domes, buffers, wheels & more
  • 3D firebox and coal
  • Animated Inside Valve Gear
  • Animated Brake Rigging
  • Dynamic smoke effects that change per season
  • Customizable lamp arrangement (locomotive & tender)
  • Customizable lamp arrangement for AI Traffic
  • SimNation’s New Locomotion v1.4 scripting featuring:
  • Cab Light effects including firebox glow
  • Gauge vibrations at speed
  • Working Waterscoop
  • Fluctuating water level dependent on route gradient
  • Performance Mode Pro for less powerful PCs
  • Advanced Safety valves, chimney particles & systems
  • Fire intensity synchronized with exhaust beat
  • Carefully created simulation for realistic performance & boiler management

Quickdrives with the following:


  • Build Date – 1847
  • Total Built – 1
  • Running Service – 1847 to 1925 (78 Years)
  • Wheel Arrangement – 2-2-2
  • Number of Cylinders – 2
  • Wheel Size – 8ft 6in
  • Boiler Pressure – 140 PSI
  • Designer – Francis Trevithick

Size: 387MB


The London & North Western Railway 2-2-2 No. 3020 “Cornwall” was a unique single-wheeler built in 1847 at Crewe Works. She is unique in being the only one of her type & a single member. She was originally built as an experiment 4-2-2 in 1847, but was extensively rebuilt & converted into a 2-2-2 in 1858 by John Ramsbottom.

In the 1840s, express passenger locomotive design was focused on the need for single large-diameter driving wheels of around 8 ft. The wheel diameter is effectively the “gear ratio” of a steam engine, and large driving wheels delivered the high linear tyre speed needed for fast locomotives, whilst keeping the axle bearing and piston speeds low enough to remain within the limits of the existing technology. Later on, increasing engine power would require better adhesion than a single pair of driving wheels could provide, but that was not a problem at the time.

As well as needing large wheels for speed, stability required a low centre of gravity, and thus a low-slung boiler. The difficulty was that the two conditions were in conflict, because the boiler of the locomotive would take up the space also needed for the driving axle. One solution to the problem was the Crampton design, in which the driving axle was moved behind the boiler’s firebox. These engines were relatively long in comparison to their contemporaries, and had long rigid frames, sometimes with as many as three carrying axles ahead of the driving axle, creating a 6-2-0 wheel arrangement. Crampton’s were most popular in France and Germany, but some were also used in England, by companies including the LNWR. One of these LNWR Cramptons, Liverpool, was particularly long, having a rigid wheelbase of 18 ft 6 in (6 m). Although the locomotive was fast, and capable of working heavy trains for long distances, its long rigid frame caused damage to the track.

Francis Trevithick had a notable pedigree as a locomotive engineer, being the son of Cornish engineer Richard Trevithick. Francis had moved north to become resident engineer, then Locomotive Superintendent of the Grand Junction Railway (GJR) (later formed into the LNWR). Cornwall was named after the county of his birth. Cornwall was an attempt to avoid the damaging long wheelbase of the Cramptons, whilst still permitting large driving wheels. By moving the driving axle ahead of the firebox, one of the carrying axles could be moved backwards, giving a shorter overall wheelbase. The difficulty of how to fit the axles past the boiler recurred, to which Trevithick provided an “extremely complicated” solution. The boiler was placed entirely underneath the driving axle. Even then, it was necessary to recess a transverse channel across the top of the boiler, so as to provide clearance for the driving axle. The trailing carrying axle passed through a crosswise tube through the middle of the firebox. This made assembly difficult, but as it was only a straight carrying axle rather than a cranked driving axle, the tube diameter required was manageable. This use of a cross-firebox axle tube was part of Crampton’s patent of 1842. As completed in 1847, and first numbered 173, Cornwall was a 4-2-2 with 8′ 6″ drivers, paired leading wheels of 3′ 6″, single trailing wheels of 4′ and an overall wheelbase of 16′ 6″. This is the condition in which she was exhibited at The Great Exhibition of 1851.

The Railway Gazette, cited in Ahrons, suggests that there was an even earlier design for Cornwall, as a 2-2-2 with single 4′ wheels both forward and back. It’s uncertain if Cornwall was ever built in this form. The drawing does show a considerable front overhang, with a high load placed on the front axle. If constructed like this, the likelihood is that it would suffer the same problems as its contemporary, Gooch’s first 2-2-2 Great Western class of 1846, where a broken front axle led to re-design as a 4-2-2. A typical Crampton feature, previously used on Liverpool, was the large diameter of the outside eccentrics used to drive the valve gear. These were so large as to be larger than the driving cranks, thus avoiding the need for an overhung (and potentially weak) crank. The 17½” × 24″ cylinders were horizontal, fed by inclined steam chests above them.

In 1858, Ramsbottom redesigned Cornwall almost completely. Little survived unchanged, other than the outside frames and the centres of the drivers. The boiler was now moved entirely above the driving axle, without any notches, channels or tubes, to what would now be regarded as conventional practice. New cylinders and valve gear were provided, fractionally smaller at 17¼” × 24″. Wheel arrangement was now 2-2-2, shortening the wheelbase still further to 14′ 10″. Ramsbottom also included his newly designed tamper-proof safety valves. Another minor rebuild in the 1870s provided a typically LNWR style of cab, with a short roof and semi-open sides. She was given her current number, 3020, in June 1886.

Cornwall was a famously successful high-speed passenger express engine of its period. Charles Rous-Marten reported an 1884 run from Crewe to Chester behind Cornwall (now far from new, and of antiquated design) at an average speed of 50.7 mph, reaching 70 mph down Whitmore bank. It remained in express service on the Liverpool-Manchester route until withdrawn in 1902 and became an inspection locomotive. In 1921 the locomotive was recorded as returning to Crewe from London as the pilot engine to a regular express. In 1925, Ahrons reports that it was still in service hauling the Mechanical Engineer’s inspection coach.

On final retirement, Cornwall was deliberately preserved, one of the first locomotives to be so treated.

She is owned by the National Railway Museum and resides at Buckinghamshire Railway Centre.

A Complete video on Cornwall can be watched here:

and here

1 review for LNWR No. 3020 “Cornwall”

  1. Robredz (verified owner)

    Want a piece of Railway History? A locomotive from 1847, Cornwall was built by Francis Trevithick (son of Richard Trevithick) at Crewe in 1847 rebuilt by John Ramsbottom, with help from Frank Webb who added a cab after he became CME so it so it sort of looked like an overgrown rebuilt Lady of the Lake, last used as the Director’s Salloon , it took CJ Bowen Cooke CME to Euston shortly before his death in 1920, it returned to Crewe as Pilot Engine to Claughton Patriot on the 2pm Corridor. That will be a brilliant recreation when the Claughton is released in the future.

    As to the model, its well detailed looks amazing I will make a video of it shortly. It drives superbly, and is accurate in driving physics for a large Single, as in getting away from standstill is a work of art, too much regulator, and wheel spin is easy to provoke, so it easy go and use sander, even at 20 -25 mph you can induce spin, and the sparks look good.

    All in all I rate it as a Must Have for LNWR railfans. Ideal consist for Cornwall’s power, a 50 foot Composite and Brake, she should be able to maintain 50 – 55 mph with that load on the level or slight downgrade.

Add a review